Five-minute presentation outline
https://ai-essay.com/guides/presentation-planning-worksheet

Original fictional practice material. The brief, source notes and proposed talk below are constructed for this exercise. They do not describe an actual campus, research study, presentation or AI output.

Brief: Give a five-minute class presentation recommending what to test before choosing a guide format for a campus history walk. The classmates have not seen the guide. Use only S1–S3 below. In this constructed brief, questions follow the five-minute talk; your own assignment may count them differently.

S1 — Constructed project brief: The proposed history walk has twelve stops. The project must give visitors a way to locate each stop and read its short historical note. No preferred guide format is specified.

S2 — Constructed design record: The web draft links stop locations to notes and needs a network connection to load. Network availability along the route has not been checked. The print draft places the map and notes across four pages. Neither draft has been tested with visitors.

S3 — Constructed planning record: A small pilot can compare how visitors locate the next stop and find its note using each draft. The record contains no pilot results, participant count, accessibility review, production cost or maintenance estimate.

Planned storyboard: the allocations total 300 seconds, not an observed delivery time. These are speaking notes, not a timed full script.

1 · Frame the decision
50 seconds planned
Which guide should we test?
A simple route sketch labelled “conceptual, not to scale”; no invented geography.
Our decision is what to test, not which format has already won. Introduce the twelve-stop task from S1. Say aloud that the material is a constructed design brief.

2 · Compare what is known
80 seconds planned
Two drafts, two unresolved constraints
Two labelled columns: web needs a connection; print uses four pages. Put S2 beside the comparison.
S2 gives us design facts, not visitor outcomes. Explain the network dependency and the four-page layout. Neither proves that visitors will fail. Transition: these uncertainties tell us what to check.

3 · Propose an inspectable pilot
100 seconds planned
Observe the same task with each draft
A three-step task diagram: locate next stop → find note → record difficulty; mark it “proposed”.
Use the tasks in S3 to compare the drafts. Record the draft version, task, assistance needed and unresolved questions. Separately check network availability. Sampling, access needs and practical arrangements still need to be agreed; no results are available.

4 · Close with the bounded recommendation
70 seconds planned
Test both before committing
A short decision list: pilot both; review access and maintenance; decide after evidence. Add S1–S3 locators.
Recommend a pilot of both drafts. Explain that the source pack cannot settle visitor preference, accessibility or cost. End with the decision the future evidence should inform, without predicting a winner.

Actual rehearsal time: not recorded; no talk was run.

Supporting guidance (not evidence for the fictional campus):
https://www.scu.edu/provost/writingcenter/resources/public-speaking-resources/presentations----planning-as-storyboarding/
https://oralcommprogram.stanford.edu/presentation-and-delivery/presentation-content
https://www.niu.edu/presentations/rehearse/index.shtml
https://digitalaccessibility.virginia.edu/accessible-tips-improving-presentation-materials
https://eocr.virginia.edu/about-us/accessibility/best-practices-presentations