Accuracy and sourcing
Material product facts should link to a first-party source. We prefer current documentation over promotional summaries and avoid exact prices unless they are necessary and dated. Editorial conclusions are labeled as our take.
Editorial oversight and supporting tools
A human editor—the site owner—reviews the material, checks important claims against linked sources and is responsible for editorial decisions and corrections. AI may assist with research, organization and drafting; editorial judgment remains with the editor. Source-based profiles and suggested exercises are distinguished from documented product tests. Read our research methodology for the evidence each type of page provides.
Editorial independence
Directory inclusion and conclusions reflect documented capabilities, practical fit and limitations. We do not invent test results or sell a positive verdict.
Corrections
We correct factual errors without waiting for a scheduled refresh. Substantive changes update the page modification record; source-check dates remain tied to the material actually checked. Correction requests can be sent to info@ai-essay.com with a supporting source.
Keeping guidance current
We update or rewrite older pages at their established addresses. Verified original publication dates remain distinct from substantive revision dates. Supporting samples can remain accessible with their original context, without being presented as evidence about a current product.